ISSA - International Securtities Services Association

Compliance to the ISSA Recommendations 2000

Market: Norway

 

Status: October 31, 2001

 

Recommendation 5

The major risks in Securities Systems should be mitigated by five key measures:

1. Does the market use DvP settlement procedures in accordance with one of the recognised BIS models? If so, which one? If the model is not BIS model 1, are there plans to move to this model? Yes, DvP settlement procedures is in place using BIS model 3.
No specific plans to move to model 1, as market signals no need for RTGS.
2. Does the market have a rolling settlement cycle of T+3 or shorter for all exchange traded instruments? The standard rolling settlement cycle is T+3, although shorter (down to T+1) or longer periods may be agreed.
3. Could the market reduce the current settlement period to T+2 or below, without increasing fails rates? If so, how would this be achieved, and what plans are there to shorten the existing settlement cycle? Fail rates are not a problem related to domestic trades. For cross border trades, the fail rate is much higher. Reasons behind are late instructions, lack of stock or counterparty (CP) lack of stock. T+2 is not a technical issue as the CSD already offers shorter settlement cycles. OK for domestic settlements, but subject to increased fail rates if implemented for cross border trades.
4. Is matching of trade details achieved on trade date, at least for direct market participants; and by trade date plus one for indirect participants? By T/D for direct participants and by T+1/T+2 for indirect participants.
5. Is the depository scrip-less, and, if not, is it working to enable scrip-less settlement? Yes it is.
6. Does the market allow partial settlements? This is not common practice but it occurs occasionally.
7. Can the depository accommodate same day turnarounds? Yes.

Bank of International Settlements (BIS) Settlement Models

Model 1: Systems that settle transfer instructions for both securities and funds on a trade-by-trade (gross) basis, with final (unconditional) transfer of securities from the seller to the buyer (delivery) occurring at the same time as final transfer of funds from the buyer to the seller (payment).
Model 2: Systems that settle securities transfer instructions on a gross basis, with final transfer of securities from the seller to the buyer (delivery) occurring throughout the processing cycle, but settle funds transfer on a net basis, with final transfer of funds from the buyer to the seller (payment) occurring at the end of the processing cycle.
Model 3: Systems that settle transfer instructions for both securities and funds on a net basis, with final transfers of both securities and funds occurring at the end of the processing cycle.